TikTok ban in India:An uncertain future for app looms; An increase in content regulation can affect many others Newstracker

TikTok ban in India:An uncertain future for app looms; An increase in content regulation can affect many others Newstracker

TikTok ban in India:An uncertain future for app looms; An increase in content regulation can affect many others NewstrackerTikTok ban in India: An uncertain future for app looms; An increase in content regulation can affect many others

"While there's little question that there area unit vital problems with TikTok, a reading of the order doesn't clarify what even a ban"

Update: TikTok has made a statement regarding the ban by the Madras High Court: "We welcome the decision of the Madras High Court to appoint Arvind Datar to Amicus Karia (Independent Lawyer) in the court. We believe in the Indian judicial system. And we are optimistic about a result that will be achieved by more than 120 million monthly active users in India, Displaying Atmkta and continue using Tiktok to catch this case in their everyday lives. "

The Madras High Court is expected to hear the objections of Chinese company Bathinda against the ban of Tikkak court on April 16. Although it should be seen that the Madras High Court, or after which the Supreme Court (which will hear on April 22 the same issue) will separate the interim order, this order presents concerns for the future of content regulation in India.

This is because there is no doubt that there are important issues with stalking, by reading the order it is not clear what is the justification of the ban. Many other sites present very similar issues, and it is not clear what was seen as a different factor which caused the ban. This is especially important when sites like Google or YouTube were asked to develop a technical solution to deal with their content related issues by the top court.

Worldwide Issues with TikTok

Throughout the world, there have been many concerns with stick lift and its contents, due to which it was previously banned in Indonesia and Bangladesh. The primary concern is with demographic, which attracts tactics, which is a large number of children and young people.Despite the regulation of thirteen years, youngsters of all ages area unit mistreatment the app.

Parents, in various reports, were allowed to interact with the children who have been expressed concerns, because the conversation is possible with strangers through the app. These factors have definitely attracted the attention of sex predators and other such elements on the app.
For example, in the UK, a 2019 BBC investigation resulted in several pedophilic comments and conversations on the app. It has been further informed in the investigation that tilting was very active in removing illegal material or comments, which were posted on its app, it was not possible to remove or block the person holding such content or comments. she came.

Although it is not clear if tatters have failed to remove such users in India, then this is a definite cause for concern, because the risk that does not prevent such persons is forward for the sex poachers of other children. There is a risk. The liabilities of an arbitrator are not limited to the removal of harmful material, but also to do the right to work. Obligations to exercise due to diligence are definitely involved in preventing the mediator's exposure to illegal material before its best capacity.


For example, under Indian laws, section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, excludes illegal material and these basic rules of fair labor are included. The IT (Intermediary Guidelines) Rules, 2011 specifically give the right to remove those arbitrators who do not follow their guidelines under rule 3 (5). This, at least, will prevent such persons to prevent further risk of children.

However, Section 79 and IT regulations do not include a specific obligation to report such incidents that affect children. However, such a requirement can be found on sexual offenses under section 19 and 20 of the Protection of Children Act, 2012, which in reality, determines the penalties for failing to report such crimes against a child. However, the terminology of the section does not explain whether the mediators, who have a safe harbor under section 79, are also under this obligation. In this order, a special law has been called by the Madras High Court to deal with the online privacy of children.

Court reasons for the interim ban

In the present case, the Madras High Court order provides a list of the reasons for the ban, including the availability of pornographic material, the risk of children, or the person being subjected to pranks, for sex killers. Violation of privacy and its addiction in young people. In its interim order, the court said that being ... accustomed to the TikTok app, and because of similar applications, or cyber games, the future of youth and the mentality of the children are spoiled.

Reasons, of course, offer significant reasons for concern, do not specify how tactics differ from other social media sites like YouTube, Facebook or even Instagram, where there are similar problems. Nor does it specify why tactics need to take appropriate measures to prevent such violations. For example, Byteadens argues that a very small amount of content - 0.0006%, is marked by users as inappropriate, and the remaining is valid content. This factor, if true, should be kept in mind when banning an app.


What order will be reviewed?

Increasing number of restrictions related to content in the country, often without adequate reason or adequate exploration of alternative solutions, is the cause of concern. If an alternative or a less aggressive solution is possible, then it should be kept in mind.

In this case, it has to be seen that the Madras High Court or the Supreme Court will review this interim order, such as looking at factors like pre-set set and feasibility of adopting alternative solutions, such as adoption. Following technical measures or minimum standards.

Currently, in compliance with the order of the court, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has asked Google and Apple to pull the app from their store. The order has also prevented the media from broadcasting any video of TikTok!

Post a Comment

0 Comments